Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2009 11:35:18 GMT 8
Hello Mr. Tony
Thanks for explaining the situation. I hope people will come into their senses and consider what is already available to them.
Let us move on and concentrate on the battery hearn. Are there any information that you can provide me with this gun?
Salamat Po.
Bal
Bikbok38
|
|
|
|
Post by fots2 on Jun 9, 2009 11:50:22 GMT 8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2009 12:25:55 GMT 8
Thanks Mr. Fots. How about other information such as operations, firing and its effects? What are the main targets of Hearn?
|
|
|
|
Post by batteryboy on Jun 10, 2009 13:15:12 GMT 8
You may want to be specific here as there are many things that can be mentioned about the battery.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2009 13:48:11 GMT 8
Any information other than the ordinary that you are willing to share. It seems that you know a lot especially when it comes to the guns.
Salamat Po
|
|
|
|
Post by batteryboy on Jun 16, 2009 11:11:41 GMT 8
Again, give me specifics
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2009 13:29:44 GMT 8
Ok, here are some specific questions:
1. Did Battery Hearn fire against Japanese boats
2. Did battery hearn fire against the Japanese in Bataan after it fell?
3. Did the batttery get damaged during the Japanese attacks.
My first 3 questions/
Salamat Po
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2014 9:41:26 GMT 8
HAHAHA!! I just had to laugh at the photographic evidence documenting Hearn's travels!
Here's a gem: way back in the early 1950's, when the means to get to Corregidor was via a Czech hydrofoil from the Luneta area, Dad heard the Dept of Tourism tour guide say that Hearn was only fired once when it was built and never fired against the Japanese because it could not traverse!
|
|
